Archive for the ‘Settlements’ Category

Pfizer Settles Detrol Marketing Allegations

Pfizer Inc. agreed to pay $14.5 million to settle False Claims Act allegations related to marketing of its drug Detrol.  The qui tam suit alleged that Pfizer illegally marketed Detrol–a drug approved for the treatment of overactive bladder–for use in men with enlarged prostates and related conditions, including bladder obstruction. Pfizer denied all allegations of wrongdoing in a statement.

Of the $14.5 million settlement, $11,878,846 will go to the federal government, and $2,621,154 will go to state Medicaid programs.  The whistleblowers will receive  a relator’s share of $3,282,019 under the False Claims Act.  The settlement was part of the governments’ Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team (HEAT), announced in May 2009 by the Department of Justice and the Department of Health and Human Services.

Posted in Off-Label Marketing, SettlementsNo Comments

Doctor Pays $349,860 to Settle FCA Allegations

A Louisville, Kentucky physician, Dr. Steven H. Stern, and his practice, Kentuckiana Center For Better Bone and Joint Health (“KCB”), have settled allegations of overbilling Medicare.  The complaint, brought by a former employee, claims that Stern and KCB falsely billed Medicare for rheumatoid arthritis infusions over a three-year period.  Specifically, the complaint alleges that Stern and KCB split vials of Infliximab across multiple patients, then billed Medicare as if an entire vial were used for each patient.

In addition to the $349,860 paid to settle the overbilling allegations, Stern and KCB will pay the attorney’s fees, costs, and expenses of the former KCB employee whistleblower.  The whistleblower will receive a payment of $70,000 as a realtor’s share.

Posted in Healthcare Fraud, Settlements1 Comment

Home Healthcare Chain Settles with Government for $150 Million

Maryland-based Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. (“Maxim”) agreed to pay $150 million to settle criminal and civil charges relating to a nationwide scheme to defraud state Medicaid programs and the Veterans Affairs program. Maxim will pay $130 million in civil settlements and a $20 million fine as part of a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (“DPA”). If Maxim complies with the DPA’s reform and compliance requirements, it will avoid a conviction on the health care fraud charges.

According to the complaint, Maxim submitted more than $61 million in fraudulent billings to government healthcare programs for services not rendered or not reimbursable. From 2003 through 2009, Maxim received over $2 billion in reimbursements from programs in 43 states.

Eight former Maxim employees and the parent of a former Maxim patient pleaded guilty to federal charges arising out the submission of false billings and false statements.

Posted in Healthcare Fraud, SettlementsNo Comments

Drugmaker Settles Qui Tam Claims for $26.7 Million

Novo Nordisk will pay $25 million to the U.S. Government to settle allegations of improper marketing of the anti-clotting drug NovoSeven. The complaint alleged that the company improperly promoted NovoSeven for indications not approved by the Food and Drug Administration.

Novo Nordisk also agreed to pay $1.725 million to the U.S. Government and four states to resolve allegations that its sales representatives paid Rite Aid pharmacists to recommend the diabetes drugs Novolin and Novolog.

Novo Nordisk made no admission of wrongdoing in either settlement.

Posted in Anti-Kickback Statute, False Claims, Off-Label Marketing, SettlementsNo Comments

Berg & Androphy Represent Whistleblower in American Grocers, Inc. Lawsuit

Last month the Department of Justice announced that American Grocers, Inc., has agreed to pay $13.2 million to settle a lawsuit that charged the Houston company with changing "use-by" labels on food sold and shipped to U.S. troops in the Middle East during the Iraq war.

The case began in 2005 after Delma Pallare, despite fears of retaliation, blew the whistle on American Grocers, Inc. and its owner Samir Itani, and brought to light the illegal conduct.

Ms. Pallares, represented by the law firm of Berg & Androphy, brought her lawsuit, also known as a qui tam action, under the Civil False Claims Act in the Southern District of Texas. The Houston law firm spent 5 years relentlessly pursuing the case along with Assistant U.S. Attorney Michelle Zingaro. As a result, the government issued a search warrant for American Grocers’ warehouse, indicted Itani, and intervened in the qui tam action.

View Press Release
View Los Angeles Times Cover Story
View Houston Press Cover Story

Posted in Qui Tam, Settlements, Whistleblower LawsuitNo Comments

Whistleblower Recieves $176,000 in Cochlear Case

$176,000 was just paid to qui tam whistleblower who filed a lawsuit against Cochlear Americas on behalf of the federal government. Whistleblower Brenda March filed the lawsuit as the company allegedly paid illegal remuneration to health care providers as an incentive to sell Cochlear devices.

The total settlement with Cochlear Americas was worth $880,000. The defendant company is a subsidiary of the Australian company Cochlear Limited.

March originally filed using provision in the Anti-Kickback Act and False Claims Act, saying that the company was clearly paying kickbacks to physicians who sold Cochlear devices to Medicare and Medicaid patients.

Posted in Anti-Kickback Statute, False Claims, Federal False Claims Act, Government Intervention, Healthcare Fraud, Qui Tam, Qui Tam Litigation, SettlementsNo Comments

AtriCure Case Reaches Settlement

Earlier this week AtriCure, Inc. executed a settlement with the Department of Justice in a case brought to court by a relator in 2007. AtriCure, primarily a manufacturer of cardiac surgical ablation systems, settled with the Department of Health and Human services for $3.8 million plus interest covering a five year period.

The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas and charges AtriCure in violation of the Federal False Claims Act. By using illegal kickbacks and sponsoring non-branded marketing, AtriCure coaxed medical practices into favoring the corporation’s costly in-patient cardiac surgical ablation procedure over a clinically more effective out-patient catheter process.

Compensation for the costs incurred to Medicare because of the more costly treatment being falsely preferred are being sought by the relator and the Department of Justice on behalf of the Department of Health and Human Services.

In a press release earlier this week, the Department of Justice stated that this case is part of a larger movement to fight healthcare fraud. In the last year alone, the legal jurisdiction granted by the False Claims Act has been used by the US Government to recover approximately $2.2 billion in cases of fraud towards United States health care programs.

Posted in Anti-Kickback Statute, Federal False Claims Act, Healthcare Fraud, Off-Label Marketing, SettlementsNo Comments

Announcement of Pfizer’s Off-Label Settlement a Harbinger of Increasing Accountability

Last Wednesday, the Justice Department held a conference to announce Pfizer’s off-label criminal and civil settlement for its fraudulent marketing practices.

Pfizer’s subsidiaries will plead guilty to a felony violation of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act for misbranding with the intent to defraud or mislead. It will pay a criminal fine of $1.195 billion and forfeit $105 million, bringing the total criminal settlement to $1.3 billion.

The civil settlement of $1 billion will resolve claims under the False Claims Act that Pfizer illegally promoted four of drugs (most notably the anti-inflammatory drug Bextra), caused false claims to be submitted to government healthcare programs for indications other than those approved by the FDA, and provided kickbacks to doctors to induce them to prescribe these drugs.

Pfizer has also entered into a Corporate Integrity Agreement with the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services that will subject the company’s marketing practices to additional review procedures and safeguards to help avoid and promptly detect similarly offending conduct. For example, Pfizer’s executives will need to complete annual compliance certifications and the company will be required to make detailed disclosures on its website.

The settlement is notable enough for its sheer magnitude: it is the largest in the Department of Justice’s history; it also represents the largest criminal fine imposed ever in the United States for any matter.

But the story behind the story is also interesting. The settlement itself was already announced–and largely completed–by the Bush administration. But whereas the Bush administration was less likely to tout its strikes against big pharmaceutical companies, the Obama administration is happy to take the credit. This certainly signals a bleak future for the drug companies. The administration appears poised to go after these cases with more gusto, especially as it faces criticism for the high cost of Obama’s healthcare proposals.

In January, Eli Lilly and Company settled similar claims over its marketing of Zyprexa for $800 million. The success of that case can be traced directly to courageous stands taken by employee whistleblowers.

The six whistleblowers in the Pfizer case will share some $102 million of the federal portion of the civil recovery. As employee whistleblowers continue to work with the current administration, we can expect to see more of these announcements in the coming months.

Learn more about the Justice Department Conference
Learn more about Pfizer’s Corporate Identity Agreement
Learn more about Eli Lilly and Company’s Zyprexa case

Posted in Damages, Healthcare Fraud, Off-Label Marketing, Qui Tam Litigation, SettlementsNo Comments

This blog is designed to provide general information only. This information is not and should not be construed to be legal advice. The transmission of the information found on this blog also does not result in the formation of a lawyer-client relationship.

Copyright 2012 Berg & Androphy.